Originally posted by hoss+Jun 9 2004, 07:02 PM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hoss @ Jun 9 2004, 07:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-3-fords1000@Jun 9 2004, 10:12 AM
Does anyone know what it would sound like if I put component speakers in back of the car instead of the 6x8's? I figure the mid's in the package tray and the tweets in the headliner or c-piller if there is a trim piece. There will still be a sub in the trunk and components in the front regardless.
if you want input from real audiophiles they will all say the same thing... why even bother with rear fill? :headscratch:
rear fill speakers does two things: it wastes power, and wastes space. get a good set of front components, install them properly(that word is important...
PROPELY, get adequate clean power, and sit back and enjoy.
it you just want to put speakers in the back just to do it, then locate the mid right next to the tweet, firing straight up into the back glass. simple install, its gonna bounce the waves up towards you and your rear passengers can hear it all. just remember to keep the mids and tweets together, mounting your tweeters up high and your mids down low will ruin your imaging, not help it. best thing for imaging is properly aimed fronts, no rear fill. dont worry about equidistant spacing between them, if you want to get nity gritty then buy a good alpine or eclipse HU which has time allignment. but most people cant tell a huge difference with time allignment, so this isnt too important
hope this helps, but i still vote a big no on rear fill. good luck with it though if you decide to go through with it. [/b][/quote]
But if you're going to listen to everything at moderate levels.... rear fill is fine. If you're going all out competition and what not, well I would say no to rear fill.