Joined
·
263 Posts
There are many advantages/disadvantages to both designs but I'm not gonna get into that. What no one said was that not all non OHC engines. I think it was an old Chevy 3.1 that used conventional valves. The lifters actuate the valve directly instead of using rockers. The problem is that they don't work as efficiently. The other major and more obvious would be the Ford Flat Head V8. It's called a flat head because the head was just the cover over the cylinders with the spark plug in it. Most lawn mower engines are not OHV just because the size and simplisity of them but the high tech ones are OHV and the new bigger commercial units have OHC.Originally posted by sfblacksel@Jan 14 2004, 06:54 PM
Very good link eCar. I know understand my freqent loose of traction on my Duratec.. I just don't see why they still make the ohv, other than cost savings.![]()
So the OHV isn't a antique dinosaur like some people make it out. It is a step up. Then the SOHC then the DOHC as well as Honda having some weird 3 valve hybrid designs in between.
And my personal preference is obviously the OHV just because it works well, it is proven, it is decently efficient without costing too much. Also some of the most popular and best engines are OHV, the Ford 5.0, the chev 5.7, and not to forget the 500+ hp Viper V10.