are the transmissions really that bad - Page 3 - Taurus Car Club of America : Ford Taurus Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #21 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 09:17 PM
I'll Be Watching You!

 
sousa632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Forked River, NJ
Chapter: Northeast
Year: 2001
Model: Mercury Sable Wagon
Engine: 3.0L 24v Duratec V6
Posts: 13,202
Rep Power: 74
    
Trader Score: 2 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by JW657 View Post
I've got around 100,000 miles on the AX4S in my Windstar. It's about 1,000lbs heavier than a Taurus and the engine has 240lb-ft of torque. It has an aftermarket cooler. I was pulling a 2,000+ lb trailer around for about a week during the summer, my total combined weight was over 6,400lbs.

I worry about how long it will last, but it has already seen some abuse and is still working good.... mostly.

I would be very surprised if it gets to 150,000 without somehow failing.
My 98 Winnie just turned 160K last night. Dont know if the trans is original but I would guess it probibly is. The trans shifts REALLY nicely. No chatter, no delay in gears, nothing.

The 01 Sable, has a slight chatter when shifting into reverse or drive sometimes but it's VERY slight. Other than that......... no issues and smooth shifts, no slippage.

I need to knock on everything that is wood right now.

John
'01 Sable LS Premium Wagon Duratec, 99 Dodge Durango 318 V8

sousa632 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 09:37 PM
Senior Member
 
SloppyJalopey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Brantford, Ontario Canada
Chapter: Eastern Canada
Posts: 612
Rep Power: 11
 
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by fct View Post
"Ford Five Hundred" which was available since year 2005 with a 6-speed auto transmission. .
My grandmother owns one with a CVT trans and a duratec engine, I wonder if anyone has ever tried putting the new style 6speed or a CVT into their taurus yet? Giving myself some ideas over here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sousa632 View Post
I need to knock on everything that is wood right now.
Got Wood? (Grain trim)


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


2002 Ford Taurus LX - Trans Failure at 350 000 KM

2000 Ford Taurus SEL - DD 260 xxx KM
SloppyJalopey is offline  
post #23 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 10:21 PM
fct
Devoted Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Chapter: Southern
Posts: 1,768
Rep Power: 25
 
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheila View Post
Fct, which year 500/Montego do you have? Have you had any rear brake problems? Awd or fwd? Does the 3.0 tec move the substantially larger car ok?
FWD. The engine sounds strained, but the transmission shifts better, and gear ratios are better, closer to each other, so the throttle is better than Taurus at any speed, even a Taurus with Duratec perhaps could have better or the same 0-60 time. The car normally cruises at RPM that's about 500RPM lower than a g3 Duratec. The 500 actually uses less fuel than a g3 Taurus.

Rear brakes: two months ago one brake pad wore out and scratched the rear disk. This was strange because other brake pads had quite a bit of meat on them. The brake job was straightforward. My understanding is that these cars go through brake pads much faster than average. The front brake pads were replaced before 50,000 miles, and I think I should take a look at them the next time I change oil.

Last edited by fct; 12-09-2012 at 10:23 PM.
fct is offline  
post #24 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 11:05 PM
Former Moderpony

 
Dschinghis Kahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Chapter: Midwest
Posts: 1,215
Rep Power: 25
 
Trader Score: 0 reviews
I test drove a Five Hundred and found the Duratec more than adequate. Then again, I'm not exactly a speed freak.

My '04 has the delayed reverse, which is real annoying. Otherwise it seems to work okay. The '01 had 125k on it and had no transmission issues. I didn't own it real long though and I have no idea if any work had been done prior.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Dschinghis Kahn is offline  
post #25 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 08:00 PM
wjc
Devoted Member
 
wjc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,365
Rep Power: 25
 
Trader Score: 0 reviews
The 500/Montego suffer from caliper siezeup, Ford tried phenolic dual pistons and they're pretty much a 100% failure rate. Also the electronic throttle bodies in the first few years of the 500 are guaranteed to fail, the redesigned part is $600 dealer only. And motor mounts go out a lot. Other than that they're not bad cars.

"Spare the duct tape, spoil the job."
wjc is offline  
post #26 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 08:20 PM
Crazy Devoted Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Chapter: Midwest
Year: 1998
Model: Mercury Sable
Engine: 3.0L 24v Duratec V6
Posts: 18,388
Rep Power: 98
     
Trader Score: 1 reviews
^+1. I've heard they wear out rear pads quickly?
sheila is offline  
post #27 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 09:57 PM
Ben
I Drive A Fuze
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Longmeadow, MA
Chapter: Northeast
Posts: 3,053
Rep Power: 31
  
Trader Score: 1 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by fct View Post
The way I see it, the value is good if the car is bought at about $3,000 (the expense for leasing something "reasonable", like a used Fusion for a year etc) and looks in a good shape with no known major repairs pending. Drive it until any major problem surfaces (anything costing more than $500 to repair) and sell it without fixing (because it never really ends at just $500 job, one jobs usually ends up uncovering enough issues for another >$500 job and so on). If you're lucky you get at least one year of service out of it and the rest of service life I'd consider as "bonus". Paying more than $3000 even for a good looking car is risque as you never know when one of the _unknowns_, such as transmission or AC, will blow up.
So buying a used car that's more than 3k is foolish?

2012 Fusion Sport, 56k miles, White Platinum Tri-coat. Every option except nav. 28% tint, Diode Dynamics LEDs, Steeda CAI, Steeda 93 octane SCT Tune, Steeda 22.5mm RSB, Magnaflow Catback, Enkei Raijin

[SOLD]2004 SEL Premium, 72,700 miles, Vibrant White. 35% Tint, K&N Panel filter, Remote Start, 4x Infinity Reference 6832cf, JVC KW-R800BT, Rockford Fosgate 501bd, Bazooka BT1014

The Toy
1989 Mustang LX 5.0 Vert, White, T5, built motor/driveline, race suspension, fast/loud as f*ck
Ben is offline  
post #28 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 11:17 PM
Technical Advisor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blythewood, SC 29016
Chapter: Southeast
Posts: 17,410
Rep Power: 103
     
Trader Score: 7 reviews
Send a message via AIM to bull geek Send a message via MSN to bull geek
LOL...Ford went back to the phenolic pistons on that big car? Wow. Fools.

I heard the same sheila about the rear pads.

--Nick
-'66 Ford Country Squire wagon 390/C6
-'87 & '89 Mercury Colony Park wagons 302 EFI/AOD
-'90 Lincoln Town Car 302 EFI/AOD
-'03 Lincoln Town Car 4.6L/4R70W

former '87 Taurus 3.0 GL sedan, '87 Taurus 3.0 GL Wagon, '97 Taurus SHO 3.4 V8 sedan, '00 Taurus SEL 3.0 24V
bull geek is offline  
post #29 of 29 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 02:22 AM
Member
 
Radioflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Montezuma, Az
Chapter: West Coast
Posts: 227
Rep Power: 0
 
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to Radioflyer
Phenolic pistons suck. Mine are all chipped around the edges. I think I'll switch to steel seeing as how I'm about to do a complete brake overhaul soon.
Radioflyer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Taurus Car Club of America : Ford Taurus Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome