Please help,I have day time running head lights,how can I make them go off. - Page 2 - Taurus Car Club of America : Ford Taurus Forum
Register Home Forums Active Topics Topic Finder Photos Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowAuto Loans
TaurusClub.com is the premier Ford Taurus Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-19-2012, 07:55 AM   #11 (permalink)
Devoted Member
 
Member Number: 85
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maryland
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 2,351
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Rep Power: 30
crackhead has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to crackhead Send a message via Yahoo to crackhead
Default

Possibly, because it is deactivating a manufacture safety feature.

In most states driving with just your parking lights on is illegal.
Just like some states require your headlights to be on when your "wipers are in motion". NC loves to get out of state travelers on that one.
__________________
2000 Duratec SE White Wagon
<span style="font-family:Optima">Voom: FPS X-Cal2
crackhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-19-2012, 08:24 AM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Markcuda's Avatar
 
Member Number: 50963
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Clinton,Illinois
Chapter: Midwest
Drives: 2007 Taurus SEL Windveil blue
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 111
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Rep Power: 5
Markcuda is on a distinguished road
Smile

Quote:
Possibly, because it is deactivating a manufacture safety feature.
Wow, if you think that if I deactivate my day time running head lights is against the law, you are a very gullible individual

Quote:
In most states driving with just your parking lights on is illegal.
I do have the sense to know when to turn on my head lights
__________________
2007 Taurus SEL
Windveil blue
126,500 miles
Leather intirior
3.0 Vulcan motor
WeatherTech side
window deflectors.
www.Markcuda.com
Markcuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 08:32 AM   #13 (permalink)
Technical Advisor
 
Member Number: 11378
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 4,958
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Rep Power: 62
Jeff K has a reputation beyond reputeJeff K has a reputation beyond reputeJeff K has a reputation beyond reputeJeff K has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Jimmer, AFAIK, there are no laws in the US that require DRLs, unlike Canada.

DRLs do not significantly reduce headlight life as when in DRL mode, voltage to the lights is reduced.
__________________
05 Taurus SEL Duratec - my daily driver
04 Taurus SES Duratec - wifes car
95 Taurus GL Vulcan winter car
Toy #1 - 86 Tbird 5.0 (original owner) - LOTS of mods
Toy #2 - 88 Tbird Turbo Coupe - LOTS of mods
02 Pontiac Grand Prix GT
67 Honda 450 Super Sport - completely customized
Jeff K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 09:00 AM   #14 (permalink)
Devoted Member
 
Member Number: 33869
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montana
Chapter: Pacific Northwest
Drives: 2000 Taurus SE 3.0 OHV Vulcan
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 1,192
Trader Score: 1 reviews
Rep Power: 10
downhill is on a distinguished road
Default

In Montana we have sections that are DRL areas but no ticket if you fail to comply.
I run with my lights at day to be seen by people passing from the other direction by my own choice.
At $10 a bulb I really do not care if it keeps me from a head on on a lonely stretch of road to nowhere Mt.
My rigs are to old for the feature to not have the choice.
The dealer can hold some things over our heads which is the basic bummer
downhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 09:31 AM   #15 (permalink)
Devoted Member
 
JIMMER's Avatar
 
Member Number: 32379
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto
Chapter: Eastern Canada
Drives: 2002 Taurus SE 3.0 Vulcan
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 1,598
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Rep Power: 12
JIMMER will become famous soon enough
Default

Wasn't sure if any states have a DRL law. I'm in Toronto and they are mandatory here by law.
__________________
James

2002 TAURUS SE - 3.0L VULCAN - 5 SPEED
TORONTO, ONTARIO.

Ride of the Month - Sept. 2011 - coolfords.com
Ride of the Quarter - 1st Quarter 2012 - teamtos.ca
Car of the Month - July 2012 - TCCA
Car of the Year - 2012 - TCCA


Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nbtyJTC9QU
JIMMER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 10:17 AM   #16 (permalink)
Technical Advisor
 
Member Number: 1771
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blythewood, SC 29016
Chapter: Southeast
Drives: 00 SEL Sedan DOHC
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 16,932
Trader Score: 7 reviews
Rep Power: 93
Bull Geek has a reputation beyond reputeBull Geek has a reputation beyond reputeBull Geek has a reputation beyond reputeBull Geek has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Bull Geek Send a message via MSN to Bull Geek
Default

On 04-07 models, I don't think you can turn the DRL option on/off through software.

You'll have to pick up an SJB from a junkyard car 04-07 model that did not have the option, but did have the other options.

So you'll want a "high" series box w/o DRL. You have a "high" series box w/DRL right now. The new box will have a new 5 digit master code for the keypad.
__________________
--Nick

-True Blue MC 2003 Lincoln Town Car | V8 SOHC/4R70W | 55K
-Silver Frost MC 2000 Ford Taurus SEL | V6 DOHC/AX4N | 198K
--Wood paneled 1991 Mercury Grand Marquis LS Colony Park wagon | V8 OHV/AOD | 180K ish?
--Ugly Colored 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis LS Colony Park wagon | V8 OHV/AOD | 303K miles!
Former...
'87 Taurus 3.0 GL sedan, '87 Taurus 3.0 GL Wagon, '97 Taurus SHO 3.4 V8 sedan
Bull Geek is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 11:07 AM   #17 (permalink)
Devoted Member
 
Lgbpop's Avatar
 
Member Number: 7489
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fort Myers, Florida USA
Chapter: Southeast
Drives: '90 Taurus GL Wagon 3.0L; '65 Rambler Ambassador 990 convertible
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 3,255
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Rep Power: 48
Lgbpop has a brilliant futureLgbpop has a brilliant futureLgbpop has a brilliant future
Default

Let's get something straight, everyone. The manufacturers would LOVE not to have all these silly regulations that go overboard in the name of safety. Lawmakers pass these misguided statutes, then leave it up to the auto makers to somehow implement them. Frankly, I myself see nothing safe about being forced to look at oncoming headlights during the day. It bugs me that I have to be inconvenienced because another driver won't pay enough attention to actively watch for oncoming traffic.

If you think things are bad now, watch what happens when manufacturers have to figure out how to double fuel economy with existing technology - just because Washington decided it would be a good thing.
Lgbpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 11:45 AM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
Markcuda's Avatar
 
Member Number: 50963
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Clinton,Illinois
Chapter: Midwest
Drives: 2007 Taurus SEL Windveil blue
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 111
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Rep Power: 5
Markcuda is on a distinguished road
Cool

Lgbpop, very well said
Bull Geek, thank you also, I was just going to call a Ford dealership, not now.
__________________
2007 Taurus SEL
Windveil blue
126,500 miles
Leather intirior
3.0 Vulcan motor
WeatherTech side
window deflectors.
www.Markcuda.com
Markcuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 02:11 PM   #19 (permalink)
Devoted Member
 
Member Number: 85
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maryland
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 2,351
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Rep Power: 30
crackhead has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to crackhead Send a message via Yahoo to crackhead
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markcuda View Post
Number 1=I like to drive with just my parking lights on, can't do that.
Number 2=Bulb life is shortened with day time head lights.
Number 3=I don't need a car manufacturer telling me when my head lights
should be on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crackhead View Post
Possibly, because it is deactivating a manufacture safety feature.

In most states driving with just your parking lights on is illegal.
Just like some states require your headlights to be on when your "wipers are in motion". NC loves to get out of state travelers on that one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markcuda View Post
Wow, if you think that if I deactivate my day time running head lights is against the law, you are a very gullible individual


I do have the sense to know when to turn on my head lights
We are talking about state regulations/ laws. Don't ever underestimate the power of the government to figure out a way to tax you.
In the words of a VA state trooper to my friend, "I have 1,000 pages of laws, I will find something to charge you on unless you comply." The trooper pulled out what looked like the unabridged Webster dictionary or the old family bible.

You were the one that said you wanted to drive with your PARKING lights on.

I believe the 04-07 Taurus the High beam filament at a reduced voltage. The high beams rarely burn out, due to most people using the low beam more frequently.

I agree with you in disliking DRL. Especially when I have to go thru the guard shack and have to pull the handbrake 1 click to turn of the DRL at night.
__________________
2000 Duratec SE White Wagon
<span style="font-family:Optima">Voom: FPS X-Cal2
crackhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:21 PM   #20 (permalink)
Cake monster

 
Member Number: 18214
Join Date: Mar 2009
Chapter: Northeast
Drives: none right now
Visit: My Garage
Posts: 1,581
Trader Score: 0 reviews
Rep Power: 18
JW657 is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lgbpop View Post
Let's get something straight, everyone. The manufacturers would LOVE not to have all these silly regulations that go overboard in the name of safety. Lawmakers pass these misguided statutes, then leave it up to the auto makers to somehow implement them. Frankly, I myself see nothing safe about being forced to look at oncoming headlights during the day. It bugs me that I have to be inconvenienced because another driver won't pay enough attention to actively watch for oncoming traffic.

If you think things are bad now, watch what happens when manufacturers have to figure out how to double fuel economy with existing technology - just because Washington decided it would be a good thing.
GM has been petitioning the NHTSA over it since Canada made it law. First, they wanted Canadian spec DLR allowed but not required, it was initially rejected until 1995. Right after, GM started making DRL standard on all of their US vehicles. The DOT was receiving complaints shortly after about glare issues and decided to try and have the brightness reduced, domestic auto makers rejected the idea. After 2000, GM tried to get the NHTSA to mandate that all vehicles in the US be sold with it, as of 2009, it has been rejected.

You can thank the government for not having mandatory DRL in the US.

Personally, I don't care about it at all. It doesn't bother me in the least.
__________________
I love cake. I AM THE CAKE BOSS!

JW657 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2